Do you think that cod bo4 should relese something like more 15 multiplayer maps for standard adtion%3F

Call of Duty Black Ops 4 General Discussion Forum

Personaly I think you should relese more multiplayer maps for standard edition because those maps became boring. 

killswitch21623
Likes: 0
Posts: 1
Registered: ‎09-02-2019
16 REPLIES 16

They do. You only need to spend like 50 bucks. And than be lucky enough that yiu can find other players with the maps.

Roll the dice. Life is a gamble
GRaS is OP. Green Stars are OP
SaND get's everywhere
dtuchpunk Level 75
Likes: 4180
Posts: 14386
Registered: ‎09-06-2011

I have the pass, and as of yet i have not played the new maps in a MP game. The only way i got to see them was in a BOT Custome game....lol. Everytime i que and a lobby has the ability to choose the new map, there are only like 3 players waiting who eventually get bored and leave. No clue what the pass was for tbh.

Salty0099
Likes: 11
Posts: 35
Registered: ‎16-12-2016
They thought they could make a killing..

Introduction of Blackout caused great interest not only from cod fans but from other online players..

Putting the maps/dlc packs as "buy all or nothing" seemed like a masterstroke from Devs due to such interest...

What they didn't bank on was the game being an absolute connection nightmare and nothing but trouble for a huge amount of players. Word of mouth is far better than any kind of advertising/promotion.

Now they are stuck with all the problems and still having to churn out new maps etc even though the chances of them being played on a regular basis is slim because of lack of interest..

All the promos are done in advance so they still have to show front about this great online game...

They should have had Blackout as a separate "free" download when bought with game and should have had the packs as free downloads.. They would have made more money imo and people would be more reluctant imo to spend on microtransactions instead of paying for the game and also expected to buy things within it..

ATM You can't fart without them charging you for it
BettySwollax
Likes: 1112
Posts: 1932
Registered: ‎08-11-2018

Hopefully their greed will make the devs of this game and other future devs have a total rethink and do things differently without the greed.

 

Respawn Developed the free to play APEX and in 72 hours it's hit 10 million players. Just think what Call of Duty could have been if Respawn stayed and didn't leave halfway through MW3.

 

 

Somewhere, there is a signature so funny that reading it will cause an aneurism. This is not that signature.
P34nut
Likes: 835
Posts: 1669
Registered: ‎05-02-2013
The thing is, most if not all players wouldn't associate with what they are doing as greed if other franchises hadn't appeared and showed the world that you can have a "free" game and still attract players.. I must admit the only 2 games I've ever played online are cod's and FIFA.. I've never played Fortnite at all or other games of that genre because they don't appeal to me but I do understand that people will venture and try other games, even if I don't..

Buying the game, along with free blackout download, having free maps and charging for microtransactions should have been the way forward for them imo..

It's probs too late now but if I was a Dev wanting to claw back something, I'd offer Cp points to the players who have already purchased the dlc packs and stick the maps on a free to download in the next update or put them available to download as and when the player pleases...
BettySwollax
Likes: 1112
Posts: 1932
Registered: ‎08-11-2018

I haven't tried APEX, a few of my friends have tried it and they think it's a brilliant game. It's set in the titanfall 2 era but without the titans. It looks fairly good fun but I am useless at those sorts of games because I haven't played them extensively and I am the same as you in the fact that I mostly play FIFA or CoD online, I did play the division a long time ago but stuck to the PVE rather than the PVP. I haven't bought FIFA 19 because it looks like an update patch for FIFA 18.

 

I think Treyarch/Activision have been stitching up their player base for a while, remember the black ops 2 or 3 Nuketown stitch up? When anyone pre ordered the game they got nuketown with it as an incentive.Wait a few months and nuketown was free to download for everyone whether they pre ordered or not. I remember laughing at my friends for their pre order antics. I have only bought one season pass and it was for Watchdogs and luckily enough it turned out worth it for me. I ignore all pre orders and season passes usually.

Somewhere, there is a signature so funny that reading it will cause an aneurism. This is not that signature.
P34nut
Likes: 835
Posts: 1669
Registered: ‎05-02-2013
Regarding dlc/maps.

For the first one I tended to wait for feedback from friends etc before committing and go from that. The last set I never bought because 2 weeks or so later the new cod is released and I buy them on release day so the last one is a waste of money for me...

As things stand, there's not a cat in hells chance I will purchase Because I want to see what I'm buying..

I wouldn't give a random shop owner a load of money upfront in return of a lucky dip every 2/3 months so why buy a bunch of maps I've never seen or had feedback from?
BettySwollax
Likes: 1112
Posts: 1932
Registered: ‎08-11-2018

if there took more time to release cod by some extra month's or skip 1 year before the next release then the game was maybe coming better out then its now.

and also activision needs to chance his plan about most release a new cod titel each new year since if it take's longer and longer to make a good game that is better then before then it will take much time.

and for some systems its better to test it good.

 

also if there wane make a battle royal cod titel then it most be for free to play and like you see now with APEX it hits a much large player base and treyarch and activision never will get this type player base more for blackout maybe if there take there time is to make a good cod titel then it was no problem.

 

few years ago it was much time there have to make a game but now with stronger concole's with better stuff there can use to make a game it will also take lots off time to make a good game and this is something activison not care's about and if it keeps on like this way then we gone see the end off call of duty maybe soon.

Spikanor
Likes: 65
Posts: 468
Registered: ‎07-10-2011

I agree because I think the publishers more than the devs want a yearly release because it guarantees them money. I honestly think they'd be better off skipping a year or 2 and taking their time to make a game that is different but still has the Call of Duty identity. If they made the game to the best of their ability I think they would make enough money to make up for the loss of not releasing a Call of Duty game for a few years.

 

I think Call of Duty started dying after the release of MW3 and it hasn't really recovered from it. Ghost was terrible, then came the jet-packs, the specialists and now a mediocre Black Ops 3.5. They need to stop rushing out games just for the money and make a game that they can improve on and follow up on for 2 years until they release the next version of Call of Duty.

Somewhere, there is a signature so funny that reading it will cause an aneurism. This is not that signature.
P34nut
Likes: 835
Posts: 1669
Registered: ‎05-02-2013

Studios